Back to atlas

country page

Serbia

Zakon o autorskom i srodnim pravima (prečišćen tekst sa izmenama 2009, 2011, 2012, 2019).

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020251998: 60%1999: 60%2000: 60%2001: 60%2002: 60%2003: 60%2004: 60%2005: 60%2006: 60%2007: 60%2008: 60%2009: 20%2010: 20%2011: 20%2012: 20%2013: 20%2014: 20%2015: 20%2016: 20%2017: 20%2018: 20%2019: 20%2020: 20%2021: 20%2022: 20%2023: 20%2024: 20%2025: 20%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 1993, the active event in this file is Zakon o autorskom pravu i srodnim pravima (1998).

60%

Current rationale

The 1998 Law on Copyright and Related Rights of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (which applied in Serbia) contained limitations in Articles 37–51. The most permissive research-relevant exception is Article 42, which permits a natural person (fizičko lice) to reproduce copies of a published work for personal non-commercial needs. This covers reproduction of full works but is restricted to natural persons acting for personal (private) non-commercial purposes. It does not authorize sharing/communication. Other exceptions include: quotation (Art. 46 – limited to excerpts, RED individually), use for teaching purposes (Art. 43 – educational, limited scope), reproduction by libraries (Art. 44 – institutional, limited). No general fair use/fair dealing clause exists. No TDM exception. The private use exception in Art. 42 is the most permissive for research purposes: it covers full works, all types of works, but only natural persons for personal use, and only reproduction. This maps to LIGHT BLUE. Non-commercial restriction is classification-neutral per the rules.

Exceptions considered

Čl. 4260%Private UseMost permissive

Natural person may reproduce copies of a published work for personal non-commercial needs, without authorization or payment

Čl. 430%Educational

Use for teaching purposes – reproduction of parts of works for illustration in teaching

Čl. 4440%Library Institutional

Reproduction by libraries and archives for their own needs (replacement copies, preservation)

Čl. 460%Quotation

Quotation of excerpts from a published work for purposes of criticism, review, or scientific analysis

Law changes

Zakon o autorskom pravu i srodnim pravima (1998)

Baseline · Effective 1998-05-23

60%

Relevant section: Čl. 37–51

Dates: Effective 1998-05-23 · Enacted 1998-05-15

Why this score

The 1998 Law on Copyright and Related Rights of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (which applied in Serbia) contained limitations in Articles 37–51. The most permissive research-relevant exception is Article 42, which permits a natural person (fizičko lice) to reproduce copies of a published work for personal non-commercial needs. This covers reproduction of full works but is restricted to natural persons acting for personal (private) non-commercial purposes. It does not authorize sharing/communication. Other exceptions include: quotation (Art. 46 – limited to excerpts, RED individually), use for teaching purposes (Art. 43 – educational, limited scope), reproduction by libraries (Art. 44 – institutional, limited). No general fair use/fair dealing clause exists. No TDM exception. The private use exception in Art. 42 is the most permissive for research purposes: it covers full works, all types of works, but only natural persons for personal use, and only reproduction. This maps to LIGHT BLUE. Non-commercial restriction is classification-neutral per the rules.

Exceptions considered

Čl. 4260%Private UseMost permissive

Natural person may reproduce copies of a published work for personal non-commercial needs, without authorization or payment

Čl. 430%Educational

Use for teaching purposes – reproduction of parts of works for illustration in teaching

Čl. 4440%Library Institutional

Reproduction by libraries and archives for their own needs (replacement copies, preservation)

Čl. 460%Quotation

Quotation of excerpts from a published work for purposes of criticism, review, or scientific analysis

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Zakon o autorskom i srodnim pravima (2009)

Relevant update · Effective 2009-12-24

20%

Relevant section: Čl. 46–56

Dates: Effective 2009-12-24 · Enacted 2009-12-09

Why this score

The 2009 Law replaced the 1998 law and restructured the limitations chapter. Article 47 provides for private reproduction for personal non-commercial needs of a natural person, but now explicitly excludes: (1) architectural works reproduced as buildings, (2) originals of fine art works, and (3) entire books (unless out of print for 2+ years). Because the exception now carves out specific categories of works from full-work reproduction, this moves from LIGHT BLUE to ORANGE. The exception still covers reproduction only (not sharing/communication) and is limited to natural persons. Other exceptions: Art. 49 (quotation – excerpts only, RED), Art. 50 (educational use – limited, RED), Art. 54 (library/archive reproduction – institutional, PURPLE). No fair use/fair dealing clause. No TDM exception. The most permissive exception is Art. 47, which permits full-work reproduction for some types of works but excludes others, mapping to ORANGE. The non-commercial restriction and single-copy norms are classification-neutral.

Exceptions considered

Čl. 4720%Private UseMost permissive

Natural person may reproduce published work for personal non-commercial needs, except architectural works as buildings, originals of fine art, and entire books (unless out of print 2+ years)

Čl. 490%Quotation

Quotation of short excerpts from published works for criticism, review, or scientific purposes

Čl. 500%Educational

Use for illustration in teaching and scientific research, limited to extent justified by purpose

Čl. 5440%Library Institutional

Reproduction by libraries, archives, museums, educational and scientific institutions for their own use (preservation, replacement, lending)

Čl. 460%Three Step Test

General three-step test clause: limitations must not conflict with normal exploitation and must not unreasonably prejudice legitimate interests of the author

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Zakon o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o autorskom i srodnim pravima (2019)

Relevant update · Effective 2019-09-18

20%

Relevant section: Čl. 47, 50, 54 (as amended)

Dates: Effective 2019-09-18 · Enacted 2019-09-10

Why this score

The 2019 amendments (Official Gazette RS No. 66/2019) made changes to the Copyright and Related Rights Law but did not introduce a TDM exception, a general fair use/fair dealing clause, or materially broaden the private use exception in Art. 47. The exclusions for architectural works, originals of fine art, and entire books remain. The amendments primarily addressed collective management, enforcement, and alignment with certain EU acquis provisions. The overall classification remains ORANGE because the most permissive research-relevant exception (Art. 47 private reproduction) still excludes specific categories of works from full-work reproduction. No new research-specific or TDM-specific exception was added. The three-step test in Art. 46 remains a limiting principle. The educational/scientific exception in Art. 50 remains limited to excerpts. Library exception in Art. 54 remains institutional.

Exceptions considered

Čl. 4720%Private UseMost permissive

Natural person may reproduce published work for personal non-commercial needs, except architectural works as buildings, originals of fine art, and entire books (unless out of print 2+ years)

Čl. 490%Quotation

Quotation of short excerpts from published works for criticism, review, or scientific purposes

Čl. 500%Educational

Use for illustration in teaching and scientific research, limited to extent justified by purpose

Čl. 5440%Library Institutional

Reproduction by libraries, archives, museums, educational and scientific institutions for their own use

Čl. 460%Three Step Test

Three-step test as limiting principle on all exceptions

Source links

Zakon o autorskom i srodnim pravima (prečišćen tekst sa izmenama 2009, 2011, 2012, 2019)

Current law confirmation · Effective 2019-09-18

20%

Relevant section: Čl. 46–56

Dates: Effective 2019-09-18

Why this score

As of 2025, the Serbian Copyright and Related Rights Law (as last amended in 2019) remains in force. The most permissive research-relevant exception is Art. 47 (private reproduction for personal non-commercial needs of a natural person). This permits reproduction of full works of most types but explicitly excludes: architectural works (as buildings), originals of fine art, and entire books (unless out of print 2+ years). Because specific categories of works are excluded from full-work reproduction, this maps to ORANGE. The exception covers reproduction only (not sharing/communication) and is limited to natural persons. Other exceptions in force: Art. 49 (quotation – excerpts, RED), Art. 50 (educational/scientific illustration – limited to parts justified by purpose, RED), Art. 54 (library/institutional reproduction, PURPLE), Art. 46 (three-step test as limiting principle, not enabling, RED). Serbia has not transposed the EU DSM Directive TDM exceptions (Arts. 3–4 of Directive 2019/790) as it is not an EU member state, though it is a candidate country. No TDM-specific exception exists. No general fair use or fair dealing clause exists. The non-commercial restriction in Art. 47 is classification-neutral. Uses: reproduction only. Works: all except architectural, fine art originals, and entire books. Users: natural persons only. This confirms ORANGE.

Exceptions considered

Čl. 4720%Private UseMost permissive

Natural person may reproduce published work for personal non-commercial needs, except architectural works as buildings, originals of fine art, and entire books (unless out of print 2+ years)

Čl. 490%Quotation

Quotation of short excerpts from published works for criticism, review, or scientific purposes

Čl. 500%Educational

Use for illustration in teaching and scientific research, limited to extent justified by purpose (parts/excerpts)

Čl. 5440%Library Institutional

Reproduction by libraries, archives, museums, educational and scientific institutions for their own use (preservation, replacement, lending)

Čl. 460%Three Step Test

Three-step test: scope of limitations must not conflict with normal exploitation nor unreasonably prejudice legitimate interests of the author

Original text

English rendering

Source links