Back to atlas

country page

Namibia

Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection Act, 1994 (Act 6 of 1994), as amended by Business and Intellectual Property Authority Act, 2016 (Act 8 of 2016).

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020251996: 60%1997: 60%1998: 60%1999: 60%2000: 60%2001: 60%2002: 60%2003: 60%2004: 60%2005: 60%2006: 60%2007: 60%2008: 60%2009: 60%2010: 60%2011: 60%2012: 60%2013: 60%2014: 60%2015: 60%2016: 60%2017: 60%2018: 60%2019: 60%2020: 60%2021: 60%2022: 60%2023: 60%2024: 60%2025: 60%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 2024, the active event in this file is Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection Act, 1994 (Act 6 of 1994), as amended by Business and Intellectual Property Authority Act, 2016 (Act 8 of 2016).

60%

Current rationale

As of 2025, the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection Act 6 of 1994 remains in force, as amended by the Business and Intellectual Property Authority Act 8 of 2016. The 2016 amendment substituted 'Board' for 'Minister' throughout the Act (except in ss.1, 61, 63, 69) — an administrative change that did not alter any exception or limitation provisions. The substantive exceptions for research remain identical to those that commenced in 1996. The fair dealing provisions in ss.15(1)(a), 16(1)(a), 18(1)(a), and 19(1)(a) continue to permit fair dealing for research or private study 'by, or the personal or private use of, the person using the work.' This qualifier restricts the beneficiary to the individual user, making the classification LIGHT BLUE rather than GREEN. The term 'fair dealing' covers any exclusive right (not just reproduction), but the personal/private qualifier limits the user class. The library exception (s.15(5)) remains available for non-profit library reproduction under prescribed conditions (PURPLE individually). No TDM exception has been enacted. No other amendments to the exceptions provisions have been identified. Classification-neutral factors were not considered in the color assignment.

Exceptions considered

Section 15(1)(a)60%Fair DealingMost permissive

Fair dealing with literary or musical work for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the work

Section 16(1)(a)60%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing with artistic work for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the work

Section 18(1)(a)60%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing with cinematograph film for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the film

Section 19(1)(a)60%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing with sound recording for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the recording

Section 15(5)40%Library Institutional

Reproduction of literary or musical work by librarian of a non-profit library under prescribed conditions

Section 15(2)60%Educational

Use of literary or musical work by way of illustration in publication, broadcast or recording for teaching, compatible with fair practice

Section 15(3)0%Quotation

Quotation from literary or musical work compatible with fair practice, extent justified by purpose

Law changes

Baseline

Baseline · Effective 1990-01-01

?

Dates: Effective 1990-01-01

Why this score

As of 1990-01-01, Namibia had just achieved de facto independence (21 March 1990 is the formal date, but the transitional period was underway). Prior to independence, the South African Copyright Act 98 of 1978 applied in the territory of South West Africa/Namibia. However, I was unable to retrieve and verify the full text of the South African Copyright Act 1978 as it applied in Namibia on 1990-01-01 via web search. The South African Act contained a fair dealing provision for research or private study (section 12(1)), but I cannot verify the exact text in force in Namibia at that date. Namibia's own Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection Act 6 of 1994 was not yet enacted. Because I cannot verify the actual statutory text in force on 1990-01-01, this baseline is marked AMBIGUOUS and the earliest verifiable event is the commencement of the 1994 Act.

Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection Act, 1994 (Act 6 of 1994)

Relevant update · Effective 1996-03-15

60%

Relevant section: Sections 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Dates: Effective 1996-03-15 · Enacted 1994-04-14

Why this score

The Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection Act 6 of 1994 provides fair dealing exceptions for research or private study across literary/musical works (s.15(1)(a)), artistic works (s.16(1)(a)), cinematograph films (s.18(1)(a)), and sound recordings (s.19(1)(a)). However, each of these provisions qualifies the fair dealing as being 'for the purposes of research or private study by, or the personal or private use of, the person using the work.' The phrase 'by... the person using the work' and 'personal or private use' restricts the beneficiary to the individual user. The term 'fair dealing' would normally cover any exclusive right (not just reproduction), but the qualifier 'by... the person using the work' and 'personal or private use' restricts this to individual/private use. This is not an unqualified fair dealing for research open to any user — it is qualified by the personal/private use restriction. The library exception in s.15(5) permits reproduction by librarians of non-profit libraries under prescribed conditions, but this is narrower (institutional, reproduction only). The teaching exception in s.15(2) covers illustration for teaching but is not primarily a research exception. No TDM exception exists. The most permissive exception for research is the fair dealing provision, but it is qualified as private/personal, yielding LIGHT BLUE. Classification-neutral factors (non-commercial restriction, lawful access) were not factored into the color decision.

Exceptions considered

Section 15(1)(a)60%Fair DealingMost permissive

Fair dealing with literary or musical work for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the work

Section 16(1)(a)60%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing with artistic work for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the work

Section 18(1)(a)60%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing with cinematograph film for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the film

Section 19(1)(a)60%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing with sound recording for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the recording

Section 15(5)40%Library Institutional

Reproduction of literary or musical work by librarian of a non-profit library under prescribed conditions

Section 15(2)60%Educational

Use of literary or musical work by way of illustration in publication, broadcast or recording for teaching, compatible with fair practice

Section 15(3)0%Quotation

Quotation from literary or musical work compatible with fair practice, extent justified by purpose

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection Act, 1994 (Act 6 of 1994), as amended by Business and Intellectual Property Authority Act, 2016 (Act 8 of 2016)

Current law confirmation · Effective 2017-01-16

60%

Relevant section: Sections 15(1)(a), 16(1)(a), 18(1)(a), 19(1)(a), 15(5)

Dates: Effective 2017-01-16 · Enacted 2016-08-12

Why this score

As of 2025, the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection Act 6 of 1994 remains in force, as amended by the Business and Intellectual Property Authority Act 8 of 2016. The 2016 amendment substituted 'Board' for 'Minister' throughout the Act (except in ss.1, 61, 63, 69) — an administrative change that did not alter any exception or limitation provisions. The substantive exceptions for research remain identical to those that commenced in 1996. The fair dealing provisions in ss.15(1)(a), 16(1)(a), 18(1)(a), and 19(1)(a) continue to permit fair dealing for research or private study 'by, or the personal or private use of, the person using the work.' This qualifier restricts the beneficiary to the individual user, making the classification LIGHT BLUE rather than GREEN. The term 'fair dealing' covers any exclusive right (not just reproduction), but the personal/private qualifier limits the user class. The library exception (s.15(5)) remains available for non-profit library reproduction under prescribed conditions (PURPLE individually). No TDM exception has been enacted. No other amendments to the exceptions provisions have been identified. Classification-neutral factors were not considered in the color assignment.

Exceptions considered

Section 15(1)(a)60%Fair DealingMost permissive

Fair dealing with literary or musical work for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the work

Section 16(1)(a)60%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing with artistic work for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the work

Section 18(1)(a)60%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing with cinematograph film for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the film

Section 19(1)(a)60%Fair Dealing

Fair dealing with sound recording for purposes of research or private study by, or personal or private use of, the person using the recording

Section 15(5)40%Library Institutional

Reproduction of literary or musical work by librarian of a non-profit library under prescribed conditions

Section 15(2)60%Educational

Use of literary or musical work by way of illustration in publication, broadcast or recording for teaching, compatible with fair practice

Section 15(3)0%Quotation

Quotation from literary or musical work compatible with fair practice, extent justified by purpose

Original text

Source links