Back to atlas

country page

Jordan

قانون حماية حق المؤلف رقم 22 لسنة 1992 (معدلاً بالقانون رقم 23 لسنة 2014) (Law No. 22 of 1992 on Copyright Protection, as amended through Law No. 23 of 2014).

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020251992: 60%1993: 60%1994: 60%1995: 60%1996: 60%1997: 60%1998: 60%1999: 60%2000: 60%2001: 60%2002: 60%2003: 60%2004: 60%2005: 60%2006: 60%2007: 60%2008: 60%2009: 60%2010: 60%2011: 60%2012: 60%2013: 60%2014: 60%2015: 60%2016: 60%2017: 60%2018: 60%2019: 60%2020: 60%2021: 60%2022: 60%2023: 60%2024: 60%2025: 60%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 1999, the active event in this file is قانون معدل لقانون حماية حق المؤلف رقم 29 لسنة 1999 (Law No. 29 of 1999 Amending the Copyright Protection Law).

60%

Current rationale

Law No. 29 of 1999 amended Law No. 22 of 1992. Based on available records from WIPO Lex, the amendments did not materially alter the exceptions in Article 17 relevant to research or private study. The personal use exception in Article 17(c) and the quotation/educational exceptions in Article 17(a) and (b) remained substantively the same. The classification therefore remains LIGHT BLUE based on the personal use exception permitting a single copy for purely personal use.

Exceptions considered

Art. 17(a)0%Quotation

Quotation of short passages or excerpts from a published work for criticism, discussion, or educational purposes

Art. 17(b)100%Educational

Use of a work as illustration in teaching through publication, broadcasting, or recordings

Art. 17(c)60%Private UseMost permissive

Single copy of a work for purely personal use, excluding architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books

Law changes

قانون حماية حق المؤلف رقم 22 لسنة 1992 (Law No. 22 of 1992 on Copyright Protection)

Baseline · Effective 1992-04-16

60%

Relevant section: المادة 17 (Article 17)

Dates: Effective 1992-04-16 · Enacted 1992-04-01

Why this score

The most permissive research-relevant exception is Article 17(c), which permits making a single copy of a work for purely personal use ('الاستعمال الشخصي البحت'). This covers reproduction of full works (with exclusions for architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books) but is restricted to personal/private use by individuals and does not authorize sharing or communication. Article 17(a) only permits short passages/excerpts (quotation), which is RED individually. Article 17(b) is an educational illustration exception, not a general research exception. Since Article 17(c) is the most permissive for research purposes and it restricts the beneficiary to individuals acting for personal use, the classification is LIGHT BLUE. The exclusion of certain work categories (architectural designs, computer programs, musical exercise books) could push toward ORANGE, but since the exception still permits full-work reproduction for most categories of works, the primary restriction is the 'personal use' user limitation, making LIGHT BLUE the appropriate classification. Non-commercial restriction and single-copy limit are classification-neutral factors.

Exceptions considered

Art. 17(a)0%Quotation

Quotation of short passages or excerpts from a published work for criticism, discussion, or educational purposes, within customary limits

Art. 17(b)100%Educational

Use of a work as illustration in teaching through publication, broadcasting, or recordings, within reasonable limits

Art. 17(c)60%Private UseMost permissive

Single copy of a work for purely personal use, excluding architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books

Original text

English rendering

Source links

قانون معدل لقانون حماية حق المؤلف رقم 29 لسنة 1999 (Law No. 29 of 1999 Amending the Copyright Protection Law)

Relevant update · Effective 1999

60%

Relevant section: المادة 17 (Article 17, as amended)

Dates: Effective 1999 · Enacted 1999

Why this score

Law No. 29 of 1999 amended Law No. 22 of 1992. Based on available records from WIPO Lex, the amendments did not materially alter the exceptions in Article 17 relevant to research or private study. The personal use exception in Article 17(c) and the quotation/educational exceptions in Article 17(a) and (b) remained substantively the same. The classification therefore remains LIGHT BLUE based on the personal use exception permitting a single copy for purely personal use.

Exceptions considered

Art. 17(a)0%Quotation

Quotation of short passages or excerpts from a published work for criticism, discussion, or educational purposes

Art. 17(b)100%Educational

Use of a work as illustration in teaching through publication, broadcasting, or recordings

Art. 17(c)60%Private UseMost permissive

Single copy of a work for purely personal use, excluding architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books

Source links

قانون معدل لقانون حماية حق المؤلف رقم 88 لسنة 2003 (Law No. 88 of 2003 on Amendments to the Law on Copyright Protection)

Relevant update · Effective 2003

60%

Relevant section: المادة 17 (Article 17, as amended)

Dates: Effective 2003 · Enacted 2003

Why this score

Law No. 88 of 2003 introduced significant amendments to the Copyright Protection Law, including provisions related to digital rights management and enforcement. Based on available information, the core exceptions in Article 17 relevant to research and private study were not materially altered in a way that would change the classification. The personal use exception permitting a single copy for purely personal use (with exclusions for architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books) remained the most permissive research-relevant exception. Classification remains LIGHT BLUE.

Exceptions considered

Art. 17(a)0%Quotation

Quotation of short passages or excerpts from a published work for criticism, discussion, or educational purposes

Art. 17(b)100%Educational

Use of a work as illustration in teaching through publication, broadcasting, or recordings

Art. 17(c)60%Private UseMost permissive

Single copy of a work for purely personal use, excluding architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books

Source links

قانون معدل لقانون حماية حق المؤلف رقم 9 لسنة 2005 (Law No. 9 of 2005 Amending the Copyright Protection Law)

Relevant update · Effective 2005

60%

Relevant section: المادة 17 (Article 17, as amended)

Dates: Effective 2005 · Enacted 2005

Why this score

Law No. 9 of 2005 further amended the Copyright Protection Law. WIPO Lex hosts the consolidated text of Law No. 22 of 1992 as amended through Law No. 9 of 2005. Based on available information, the exceptions relevant to research and private study in Article 17 were not materially changed in a way that would alter the classification. The personal use exception for a single copy for purely personal use remains the most permissive research-relevant exception. Classification remains LIGHT BLUE.

Exceptions considered

Art. 17(a)0%Quotation

Quotation of short passages or excerpts from a published work for criticism, discussion, or educational purposes

Art. 17(b)100%Educational

Use of a work as illustration in teaching through publication, broadcasting, or recordings

Art. 17(c)60%Private UseMost permissive

Single copy of a work for purely personal use, excluding architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books

Source links

قانون معدل لقانون حماية حق المؤلف رقم 23 لسنة 2014 (Law No. 23 of 2014 on Amendments to the Law on Copyright Protection)

Relevant update · Effective 2014

60%

Relevant section: المادة 17 (Article 17, as amended)

Dates: Effective 2014 · Enacted 2014

Why this score

Law No. 23 of 2014 is the most recent amendment to the Copyright Protection Law listed on WIPO Lex. Based on available information, the core exceptions in Article 17 relevant to research and private study were not materially altered. The personal use exception permitting a single copy for purely personal use (excluding architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books) remains the most permissive research-relevant exception. No TDM-specific exception was introduced. Classification remains LIGHT BLUE.

Exceptions considered

Art. 17(a)0%Quotation

Quotation of short passages or excerpts from a published work for criticism, discussion, or educational purposes

Art. 17(b)100%Educational

Use of a work as illustration in teaching through publication, broadcasting, or recordings

Art. 17(c)60%Private UseMost permissive

Single copy of a work for purely personal use, excluding architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books

Source links

قانون حماية حق المؤلف رقم 22 لسنة 1992 (معدلاً بالقانون رقم 23 لسنة 2014) (Law No. 22 of 1992 on Copyright Protection, as amended through Law No. 23 of 2014)

Current law confirmation · Effective 2014

60%

Relevant section: المادة 17 (Article 17)

Dates: Effective 2014 · Enacted 2014

Why this score

As of 2025, Jordan's Copyright Protection Law (Law No. 22 of 1992, as amended most recently by Law No. 23 of 2014) remains in force. The most permissive research-relevant exception is Article 17(c), which permits making a single copy of a work for purely personal use. This covers reproduction of full works by any individual for personal purposes, but excludes architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books. It does not authorize sharing, communication, or distribution. The 'purely personal use' qualifier restricts the beneficiary to individuals acting privately, not institutions or collaborative research. Article 17(a) only permits short passages/excerpts (RED). Article 17(b) permits use for illustration in teaching (potentially GREEN for teaching but not specifically for research). No TDM-specific exception exists. The single-copy limit and non-commercial nature are classification-neutral. The exclusion of certain work categories (architectural designs, computer programs, musical exercise books) from Art. 17(c) is a work-type restriction, but since the primary restriction is the personal-use user limitation, LIGHT BLUE is the appropriate classification. Jordan has no general fair use, fair dealing, or three-step-test enabling clause for research.

Exceptions considered

Art. 17(a)0%Quotation

Quotation of short passages or excerpts from a published work for criticism, discussion, or educational purposes, within customary limits

Art. 17(b)100%Educational

Use of a work as illustration in teaching through publication, broadcasting, or audio/visual recordings, within reasonable limits

Art. 17(c)60%Private UseMost permissive

Single copy of a work for purely personal use, excluding architectural designs, computer programs, and musical exercise books

Original text

English rendering

Source links