Back to atlas

country page

Honduras

Ley del Derecho de Autor y de los Derechos Conexos (Decreto No. 4-99-E, modificada por Decreto No. 16-2006).

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020252000: 60%2001: 60%2002: 60%2003: 60%2004: 60%2005: 60%2006: 60%2007: 60%2008: 60%2009: 60%2010: 60%2011: 60%2012: 60%2013: 60%2014: 60%2015: 60%2016: 60%2017: 60%2018: 60%2019: 60%2020: 60%2021: 60%2022: 60%2023: 60%2024: 60%2025: 60%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 1999, the active event in this file is Baseline.

?

Current rationale

Prior to the enactment of Decreto No. 4-99-E in 1999, Honduras did not have a comprehensive modern copyright law with detailed exceptions and limitations. The copyright provisions in force on 1990-01-01 were scattered across older civil code provisions and the 1968 Código Civil provisions on intellectual property, which did not contain detailed research or private-use exceptions comparable to modern copyright statutes. I was unable to locate and verify the full text of the copyright provisions actually in force on 1990-01-01 via web search. No official digitized version of the pre-1999 Honduran copyright regime was found.

Law changes

Baseline

Baseline · Effective 1990-01-01

?

Dates: Effective 1990-01-01

Why this score

Prior to the enactment of Decreto No. 4-99-E in 1999, Honduras did not have a comprehensive modern copyright law with detailed exceptions and limitations. The copyright provisions in force on 1990-01-01 were scattered across older civil code provisions and the 1968 Código Civil provisions on intellectual property, which did not contain detailed research or private-use exceptions comparable to modern copyright statutes. I was unable to locate and verify the full text of the copyright provisions actually in force on 1990-01-01 via web search. No official digitized version of the pre-1999 Honduran copyright regime was found.

Ley del Derecho de Autor y de los Derechos Conexos (Decreto No. 4-99-E)

Relevant update · Effective 2000-01-01

60%

Relevant section: Artículos 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50

Dates: Effective 2000-01-01 · Enacted 1999-01-01

Why this score

The most permissive research-relevant exception is Article 46(9), which permits reproduction by any means of a literary or scientific work, in a single copy, exclusively for personal use and without profit motive. This covers full-work reproduction but is restricted to personal use (individual users only) and does not authorize sharing, distribution, or communication to the public. Article 46(10) permits reprographic reproduction for teaching/exams but only of articles or 'brief extracts' — not full works. Article 46(6) is a library exception limited to preservation and replacement purposes, not research copying. Article 46(8) permits reproduction and broadcasting for teaching purposes but is limited to the extent justified by the purpose and does not specifically cover research. There is no general fair use, fair dealing, or three-step-test enabling clause. There is no TDM exception. The most permissive exception for research is Art. 46(9): it permits full-work reproduction of literary or scientific works but only for personal use (LIGHT BLUE). The single-copy and non-commercial restrictions are classification-neutral factors and do not affect the color. The restriction to 'literary or scientific' works could suggest ORANGE (excluding other work types), but since these categories are broad and cover the primary types of works relevant to research, and the key restriction is the 'personal use' qualifier limiting the user class, LIGHT BLUE is the appropriate classification.

Exceptions considered

Art. 46(9)60%Private UseMost permissive

Reproduction by any means of a literary or scientific work, single copy, exclusively for personal use, no profit motive

Art. 46(6)40%Library Institutional

Library/archive reproduction for preservation or replacement of lost/destroyed copies in permanent collection

Art. 46(8)80%Educational

Reproduction and broadcasting for teaching purposes, to the extent justified, no profit, no prejudice to normal exploitation

Art. 46(10)0%Educational

Reprographic reproduction for teaching or exams in educational institutions of articles or brief extracts of published works, fair practice, no profit

Art. 46(1)0%Quotation

Communication to the public of speeches, sermons etc. delivered in public, for news/information purposes

Art. 46(2)0%Quotation

Reproduction and making available of fragments of works seen/heard during news events, to extent justified by information purpose

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Decreto No. 16-2006 (Reforma a la Ley del Derecho de Autor y de los Derechos Conexos)

Relevant update · Effective 2006-01-01

60%

Relevant section: Artículos 46, 47 (as amended)

Dates: Effective 2006-01-01 · Enacted 2006-01-01

Why this score

Decreto No. 16-2006 amended the Copyright Law (Decreto 4-99-E). The WIPO Lex consolidated text (hn015es.pdf) incorporates these amendments. Based on the consolidated text available, the exceptions in Article 46 remain substantively the same with respect to research-relevant provisions. Article 46(9) (personal use reproduction of literary or scientific works) remains the most permissive research-relevant exception. No TDM exception was added. No general fair use or fair dealing clause was introduced. The classification remains LIGHT BLUE for the same reasons as the baseline law event.

Exceptions considered

Art. 46(9)60%Private UseMost permissive

Reproduction by any means of a literary or scientific work, single copy, exclusively for personal use, no profit motive

Art. 46(6)40%Library Institutional

Library/archive reproduction for preservation or replacement of lost/destroyed copies

Art. 46(8)80%Educational

Reproduction and broadcasting for teaching purposes, to the extent justified, no profit

Art. 46(10)0%Educational

Reprographic reproduction for teaching/exams of articles or brief extracts, fair practice, no profit

Source links

Ley del Derecho de Autor y de los Derechos Conexos (Decreto No. 4-99-E, modificada por Decreto No. 16-2006)

Current law confirmation · Effective 2025-01-01

60%

Relevant section: Artículo 46(9), Artículo 46(6), Artículo 46(8), Artículo 46(10)

Dates: Effective 2025-01-01

Why this score

As of 2025, the Honduran Copyright Law (Decreto No. 4-99-E as amended by Decreto No. 16-2006) remains in force. The TodoLegal consolidated version (last revised 2024-01-31) confirms 196 articles. The most permissive research-relevant exception remains Article 46(9): reproduction by any means of a literary or scientific work, in a single copy, exclusively for personal use, without profit motive. This permits full-work reproduction but is restricted to personal/individual use only — it does not authorize sharing, distribution, or communication to the public. There is no general fair use, fair dealing, or three-step-test enabling clause. There is no TDM-specific exception. The library exception (Art. 46(6)) is limited to preservation/replacement. The educational exception (Art. 46(8)) covers teaching but not specifically research, and Art. 46(10) is limited to articles and brief extracts. Classification-neutral factors (single-copy limit, equitable remuneration, non-commercial restriction) were not factored into the color decision. The restriction to 'personal use' is the determinative factor yielding LIGHT BLUE. Uses: reproduction only (no sharing). Works: literary or scientific works (broad categories). Users: individuals only (personal use). Result: LIGHT BLUE.

Exceptions considered

Art. 46(9)60%Private UseMost permissive

Reproduction by any means of a literary or scientific work, single copy, exclusively for personal use, no profit motive. Equitable remuneration may apply.

Art. 46(6)40%Library Institutional

Library/archive reproduction for preservation or replacement of lost/destroyed copies in permanent collection, non-profit activities only

Art. 46(8)80%Educational

Reproduction and broadcasting for teaching purposes, to the extent justified by the purpose, no profit, no prejudice to normal exploitation

Art. 46(10)0%Educational

Reprographic reproduction for teaching or exams in educational institutions of articles or brief extracts of lawfully published works, fair practice, no profit

Art. 46(1)0%Quotation

Communication to the public of political/judicial speeches and similar works delivered in public, for news purposes

Art. 46(2)0%Quotation

Reproduction and making available of fragments of works seen/heard during news events

Art. 46(7)80%Other

Reproduction for judicial or administrative proceedings, to the extent justified

Art. 46(14)0%Other

Parody of a disclosed work, no confusion, no damage, no profit

Art. 46(15)0%Educational

Students may freely note and collect lectures/conferences directed to them, but may not publish without authorization

Original text

English rendering

Source links