Back to atlas

country page

Guatemala

Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos (Decreto 33-98, as amended by Decretos 11-2006 and 21-2018).

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020251998: 20%1999: 20%2000: 20%2001: 20%2002: 20%2003: 20%2004: 20%2005: 20%2006: 20%2007: 20%2008: 20%2009: 20%2010: 20%2011: 20%2012: 20%2013: 20%2014: 20%2015: 20%2016: 20%2017: 20%2018: 20%2019: 20%2020: 20%2021: 20%2022: 20%2023: 20%2024: 20%2025: 20%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 2024, the active event in this file is Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos (Decreto 33-98, as amended by Decretos 11-2006 and 21-2018).

20%

Current rationale

As of 2025, the Guatemalan copyright law (Decreto 33-98 as amended) contains no general fair use or fair dealing clause, no TDM exception, and no specific research exception. The most permissive research-relevant exception remains Art. 65, which permits reproduction in a single copy for private use by a natural person without profit motive, but explicitly excludes the entirety of books, musical works, audiovisual/cinematographic works, and substantial parts of digital databases. This means full-work reproduction is permitted for some categories of works (e.g., individual articles, photographs, short literary works not constituting a 'book', visual art works) but not for books, entire musical works, or audiovisual works. This maps to ORANGE. Uses: reproduction only (no sharing/communication). Works: some but not all (books, musical works, audiovisual works, digital databases excluded from full reproduction). Users: natural persons only (private use). The Marrakesh Treaty exceptions (Arts. 65 Bis/Ter) are limited to persons with print disabilities and do not constitute general research exceptions. Art. 64(a) provides a broader single-copy personal use right but is read together with Art. 65's specific limitations. Art. 66 (quotation) only permits passages. Art. 63(c) (educational communication) is limited to teaching institutions. No classification-neutral factors (non-commercial restriction, single-copy limit) were used to determine the color.

Exceptions considered

Art. 64(a)60%Private Use

Single copy for personal and exclusive use of the person making it, without direct or indirect profit motive

Art. 6520%Private UseMost permissive

Reproduction in single copy for private use by natural person, excluding entirety of books, musical works, audiovisual works, substantial part of digital databases

Art. 65 Bis / 65 Ter40%Other

Reproduction and distribution of accessible format copies for persons with visual or print disabilities (Marrakesh Treaty)

Art. 660%Quotation

Quotation of pertinent passages with attribution

Art. 63(c)40%Educational

Communication for exclusively didactic purposes in teaching institutions

Art. 670%Other

Reproduction, distribution and communication of current articles for information purposes

Law changes

Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos (Decreto 33-98)

Baseline · Effective 1998-05-22

20%

Relevant section: Artículos 63, 64, 65, 66, 67

Dates: Effective 1998-05-22 · Enacted 1998-04-19

Why this score

The most permissive research-relevant exception is Art. 65, which permits reproduction of a literary or artistic work in a single copy for private use without profit motive by a natural person. However, Art. 65 explicitly prohibits reproduction of the entirety of a book, the entirety of a musical work, the entirety or substantial part of an audiovisual/cinematographic work, or all or a substantial part of a digital database. This means full-work reproduction is permitted for some categories of works (e.g., a single article, a short literary work that is not a 'book', a visual art work, a photograph) but not for books, entire musical works, or audiovisual works. This maps to ORANGE: full-work reproduction is available for at least some types of works but specific categories are excluded. Art. 64(a) similarly permits a single copy for personal and exclusive use without profit, but Art. 65 provides the more detailed regime with the work-type exclusions. There is no general fair use or fair dealing clause, no TDM exception, and no institutional/library exception for research. The quotation exception (Art. 66) only permits passages/excerpts, not full works. Art. 63(c) covers communication for didactic purposes only, not research generally. The private-use restriction (natural person, single copy, no profit) means this is not GREEN or BLUE. The work-type exclusions in Art. 65 prevent LIGHT BLUE classification (which requires full works of all types). The non-commercial restriction and single-copy limit are classification-neutral factors and were not used to determine the color.

Exceptions considered

Art. 64(a)60%Private Use

Single copy for personal and exclusive use of the person making it, without direct or indirect profit motive

Art. 6520%Private UseMost permissive

Reproduction in a single copy for private use by a natural person, without profit; but may NOT extend to entirety of a book, musical work, audiovisual/cinematographic work, or substantial part of a digital database

Art. 660%Quotation

Quotation of pertinent passages with attribution, provided not so extensive as to constitute substantial reproduction

Art. 63(c)40%Educational

Communication for exclusively didactic purposes in teaching institutions, by staff and students, non-profit, closed audience

Art. 670%Other

Reproduction, distribution and communication of current articles of economic/political/religious discussion and broadcast works for information purposes, in accordance with fair practice

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Decreto 11-2006, Reformas a la Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos (Decreto 33-98)

Relevant update · Effective 2006-03-22

20%

Relevant section: Artículos 63, 64, 65 (as amended)

Dates: Effective 2006-03-22 · Enacted 2006-03-01

Why this score

Decreto 11-2006 amended various provisions of Decreto 33-98, primarily strengthening enforcement and adding provisions related to technological protection measures and rights management information, in line with CAFTA-DR obligations. The core exceptions in Articles 63-67 were not materially changed with respect to research-relevant limitations. Art. 65 remains the most permissive research-relevant exception, still permitting single-copy private-use reproduction by a natural person but excluding the entirety of books, musical works, audiovisual works, and substantial parts of digital databases. The classification remains ORANGE for the same reasons as the baseline: full-work reproduction is available for some types of works but not for books, entire musical works, or audiovisual works. No fair use, fair dealing, TDM, or general research exception was added. No library/institutional exception for research was added.

Exceptions considered

Art. 64(a)60%Private Use

Single copy for personal and exclusive use without profit motive

Art. 6520%Private UseMost permissive

Reproduction in single copy for private use by natural person, excluding entirety of books, musical works, audiovisual works, substantial part of digital databases

Art. 660%Quotation

Quotation of pertinent passages with attribution

Art. 63(c)40%Educational

Communication for exclusively didactic purposes in teaching institutions

Art. 670%Other

Reproduction, distribution and communication of current articles for information purposes

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Decreto 21-2018, Reformas al Decreto 33-98, Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos

Relevant update · Effective 2018-10-18

20%

Relevant section: Artículos 65 Bis, 65 Ter (new), and related provisions

Dates: Effective 2018-10-18 · Enacted 2018-10-04

Why this score

Decreto 21-2018 added new exceptions (Arts. 65 Bis and 65 Ter) specifically for the benefit of persons who are blind, visually impaired, or otherwise print disabled, implementing the Marrakesh Treaty. These new provisions permit reproduction and distribution of accessible format copies for beneficiary persons. While these are important exceptions, they are restricted to a specific beneficiary class (persons with print disabilities) and do not constitute a general research exception. The pre-existing exceptions in Articles 63-67 remain unchanged. Art. 65 remains the most permissive general research-relevant exception, still permitting single-copy private-use reproduction by a natural person but excluding the entirety of books, musical works, audiovisual works, and substantial parts of digital databases. The overall classification remains ORANGE. No TDM exception, general fair use/fair dealing clause, or general research exception was added.

Exceptions considered

Art. 64(a)60%Private Use

Single copy for personal and exclusive use without profit motive

Art. 6520%Private UseMost permissive

Reproduction in single copy for private use by natural person, excluding entirety of books, musical works, audiovisual works, substantial part of digital databases

Art. 65 Bis / 65 Ter40%Other

Reproduction and distribution of accessible format copies for persons with visual or print disabilities (Marrakesh Treaty implementation)

Art. 660%Quotation

Quotation of pertinent passages with attribution

Art. 63(c)40%Educational

Communication for exclusively didactic purposes in teaching institutions

Art. 670%Other

Reproduction, distribution and communication of current articles for information purposes

English rendering

Source links

Ley de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos (Decreto 33-98, as amended by Decretos 11-2006 and 21-2018)

Current law confirmation · Effective 2018-10-18

20%

Relevant section: Artículos 63, 64, 65, 65 Bis, 65 Ter, 66, 67

Dates: Effective 2018-10-18

Why this score

As of 2025, the Guatemalan copyright law (Decreto 33-98 as amended) contains no general fair use or fair dealing clause, no TDM exception, and no specific research exception. The most permissive research-relevant exception remains Art. 65, which permits reproduction in a single copy for private use by a natural person without profit motive, but explicitly excludes the entirety of books, musical works, audiovisual/cinematographic works, and substantial parts of digital databases. This means full-work reproduction is permitted for some categories of works (e.g., individual articles, photographs, short literary works not constituting a 'book', visual art works) but not for books, entire musical works, or audiovisual works. This maps to ORANGE. Uses: reproduction only (no sharing/communication). Works: some but not all (books, musical works, audiovisual works, digital databases excluded from full reproduction). Users: natural persons only (private use). The Marrakesh Treaty exceptions (Arts. 65 Bis/Ter) are limited to persons with print disabilities and do not constitute general research exceptions. Art. 64(a) provides a broader single-copy personal use right but is read together with Art. 65's specific limitations. Art. 66 (quotation) only permits passages. Art. 63(c) (educational communication) is limited to teaching institutions. No classification-neutral factors (non-commercial restriction, single-copy limit) were used to determine the color.

Exceptions considered

Art. 64(a)60%Private Use

Single copy for personal and exclusive use of the person making it, without direct or indirect profit motive

Art. 6520%Private UseMost permissive

Reproduction in single copy for private use by natural person, excluding entirety of books, musical works, audiovisual works, substantial part of digital databases

Art. 65 Bis / 65 Ter40%Other

Reproduction and distribution of accessible format copies for persons with visual or print disabilities (Marrakesh Treaty)

Art. 660%Quotation

Quotation of pertinent passages with attribution

Art. 63(c)40%Educational

Communication for exclusively didactic purposes in teaching institutions

Art. 670%Other

Reproduction, distribution and communication of current articles for information purposes

Original text

English rendering

Source links