Back to atlas

country page

Ethiopia

Copyright and Neighboring Rights Protection Proclamation No. 410/2004, as amended by Proclamation No. 872/2014.

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020252004: 20%2005: 20%2006: 20%2007: 20%2008: 20%2009: 20%2010: 20%2011: 20%2012: 20%2013: 20%2014: 20%2015: 20%2016: 20%2017: 20%2018: 20%2019: 20%2020: 20%2021: 20%2022: 20%2023: 20%2024: 20%2025: 20%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 1999, the active event in this file is Civil Code of the Empire of Ethiopia, 1960 (Book IV, Title XI โ€“ Literary and Artistic Property).

?

Current rationale

Ethiopia's copyright law in force on 1990-01-01 was contained in the Civil Code of 1960, Book IV, Title XI (Articles 1647โ€“1674), which governed literary and artistic property. Despite extensive web searching, I was unable to retrieve the full verbatim text of these provisions from any official or WIPO-hosted source. The Civil Code provisions on copyright were known to be relatively brief and modeled on continental European traditions. Without access to the actual statutory text of the exceptions and limitations provisions (if any existed in those articles), I cannot determine the color classification with confidence. The Civil Code remained in force for copyright purposes until it was replaced by Proclamation No. 410/2004.

Law changes

Civil Code of the Empire of Ethiopia, 1960 (Book IV, Title XI โ€“ Literary and Artistic Property)

Baseline ยท Effective 1960-05-05

?

Relevant section: Articles 1647โ€“1674

Dates: Effective 1960-05-05 ยท Enacted 1960-05-05

Why this score

Ethiopia's copyright law in force on 1990-01-01 was contained in the Civil Code of 1960, Book IV, Title XI (Articles 1647โ€“1674), which governed literary and artistic property. Despite extensive web searching, I was unable to retrieve the full verbatim text of these provisions from any official or WIPO-hosted source. The Civil Code provisions on copyright were known to be relatively brief and modeled on continental European traditions. Without access to the actual statutory text of the exceptions and limitations provisions (if any existed in those articles), I cannot determine the color classification with confidence. The Civil Code remained in force for copyright purposes until it was replaced by Proclamation No. 410/2004.

Copyright and Neighboring Rights Protection Proclamation No. 410/2004

Relevant update ยท Effective 2004-07-19

20%

Relevant section: Articles 9โ€“19 (Part Three: Limitations on Copyright)

Dates: Effective 2004-07-19 ยท Enacted 2004-07-19

Why this score

The most permissive research-relevant exception is Article 9 (Reproduction for Personal Purposes), which permits private reproduction of a published work by a physical person exclusively for his own personal purposes. This covers reproduction of full works, is open to all types of works, but is restricted to individuals (physical persons) acting for personal purposes. However, Article 9(2) carves out several categories of works: (a) works of architecture in building form, (b) the whole or substantial part of a database in digital form, (c) computer programs, and (d) the whole of a book or musical work in graphic notation form. Because the exception permits full-work reproduction for some types of works (e.g., articles, short literary works, audiovisual works, photographs) but explicitly excludes full reproduction of books, musical scores, databases, computer programs, and architectural works, this is ORANGE โ€” full-work reproduction is available for at least some types of works but not all. Article 11 (library/archive exception) is more restrictive because it only covers 'published articles, other short works or short extracts of a work' โ€” not full books. Article 14 (quotation) only permits 'a short part' โ€” RED individually. Article 12 (teaching) is limited to 'short parts' and 'short works or short extracts.' No general fair use, fair dealing, or three-step-test enabling clause exists. No TDM exception exists. The non-commercial restriction on Article 9 (personal purposes) and the copy-limit aspects are classification-neutral per the rules. The key restriction driving the ORANGE classification is the exclusion of specific work categories from full-work reproduction under Article 9(2).

Exceptions considered

Art. 920%Private UseMost permissive

Private reproduction of a published work by a physical person exclusively for personal purposes; excludes architecture, databases in digital form, computer programs, whole books, and whole musical works in graphic notation

Art. 110%Library Institutional

Non-profit library/archive may make single reprographic copy of published article, short work, or short extract for study/scholarship/private research of a physical person

Art. 120%Educational

Reproduction of short part of published work for teaching illustration; reprographic reproduction of articles/short works/short extracts for face-to-face teaching in non-profit educational institutions

Art. 140%Quotation

Quotation of a short part of a published work, compatible with fair practice, not exceeding extent justified by purpose

Art. 170%Other

Free use for judicial/administrative proceedings, reproduction of public art, computer program adaptation/decompilation by lawful user

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Protection (Amendment) Proclamation No. 872/2014

Relevant update ยท Effective 2015-01-14

20%

Relevant section: Articles 2โ€“14 of the Amendment Proclamation (amending various provisions of Proclamation No. 410/2004)

Dates: Effective 2015-01-14 ยท Enacted 2015-01-14

Why this score

Proclamation No. 872/2014 amended Proclamation No. 410/2004 primarily to establish a collective management organization framework and strengthen enforcement provisions. Based on the available text of the amendment, the core exceptions and limitations in Part Three of Proclamation No. 410/2004 (Articles 9โ€“19) were not substantively altered with respect to research, private study, or TDM. Article 9 (personal reproduction with its work-category exclusions), Article 11 (library/archive copying of short works/extracts), Article 12 (teaching), Article 14 (quotation), and Article 17 (free use) remain in force as enacted in 2004. No TDM exception was introduced. The classification therefore remains ORANGE for the same reasons as the baseline under Proclamation No. 410/2004: Article 9 permits full-work reproduction for personal purposes but excludes whole books, musical scores in graphic notation, databases in digital form, computer programs, and architectural works.

Exceptions considered

Art. 9 (Proclamation 410/2004, as amended)20%Private UseMost permissive

Private reproduction of a published work by a physical person exclusively for personal purposes; excludes architecture, databases in digital form, computer programs, whole books, and whole musical works in graphic notation

Art. 11 (Proclamation 410/2004, as amended)0%Library Institutional

Non-profit library/archive may make single reprographic copy of published article, short work, or short extract for study/scholarship/private research

Art. 12 (Proclamation 410/2004, as amended)0%Educational

Reproduction of short part for teaching; reprographic reproduction of articles/short works/short extracts for face-to-face teaching in non-profit institutions

Art. 14 (Proclamation 410/2004, as amended)0%Quotation

Quotation of a short part of a published work

Art. 17 (Proclamation 410/2004, as amended)0%Other

Free use for judicial/administrative proceedings, public art reproduction, computer program adaptation/decompilation

Source links

Copyright and Neighboring Rights Protection Proclamation No. 410/2004, as amended by Proclamation No. 872/2014

Current law confirmation ยท Effective 2015-01-14

20%

Relevant section: Articles 9, 11, 12, 14, 17 (Part Three: Limitations on Copyright)

Dates: Effective 2015-01-14

Why this score

As of 2025, the copyright law in force in Ethiopia is Proclamation No. 410/2004 as amended by Proclamation No. 872/2014. No further amendments to the exceptions and limitations provisions have been identified. The most permissive research-relevant exception remains Article 9 (Reproduction for Personal Purposes). This permits a physical person to privately reproduce a published work exclusively for personal purposes (which encompasses private study and personal research). However, Article 9(2) excludes full reproduction of: (a) architectural works in building form, (b) the whole or substantial part of a database in digital form, (c) computer programs, and (d) the whole of a book or musical work in graphic notation. This means full-work reproduction is permitted for some categories (e.g., individual articles, photographs, audiovisual works, short literary works) but not for whole books, musical scores, databases, or computer programs. This maps to ORANGE: full-work reproduction is available for at least some types of works but specific categories are excluded. The exception covers only reproduction (not sharing/communication), and is limited to physical persons for personal purposes (not institutional use). Article 11 (library/archive) only covers articles, short works, or short extracts โ€” individually RED. Article 12 (teaching) covers short parts and short works โ€” individually RED. Article 14 (quotation) covers short parts only โ€” RED. No fair use, fair dealing, general three-step-test enabling clause, or TDM exception exists in Ethiopian law. The non-commercial nature of 'personal purposes' and the single-copy implication are classification-neutral factors that do not affect the color.

Exceptions considered

Art. 920%Private UseMost permissive

Private reproduction of a published work by a physical person exclusively for personal purposes; excludes architecture in building form, whole/substantial part of database in digital form, computer programs, whole books, and whole musical works in graphic notation

Art. 110%Library Institutional

Non-profit library/archive may make single reprographic copy of published article, short work, or short extract for study/scholarship/private research of a requesting physical person

Art. 120%Educational

Reproduction of short part of published work for teaching illustration; reprographic reproduction of articles/short works/short extracts for face-to-face teaching in non-profit educational institutions; broadcasting/communication for face-to-face teaching

Art. 140%Quotation

Quotation of a short part of a published work, compatible with fair practice, not exceeding extent justified by purpose

Art. 170%Other

Free use for judicial/administrative proceedings, reproduction of public art, computer program adaptation/decompilation by lawful user

Original text

Source links