Back to atlas

country page

Angola

Lei n.º 15/14, de 31 de Julho — Lei dos Direitos de Autor e Conexos.

Copyright exception history

0%20%40%60%80%100%199019952000200520102015202020252014: 40%2015: 40%2016: 40%2017: 40%2018: 40%2019: 40%2020: 40%2021: 40%2022: 40%2023: 40%2024: 40%2025: 40%YearOpenness score (%)

Selected year snapshot

For 2019, the active event in this file is Lei n.º 15/14, de 31 de Julho — Lei dos Direitos de Autor e Conexos.

40%

Current rationale

As of 2025, Lei n.º 15/14 remains the copyright law in force in Angola. No amendments to the exceptions and limitations provisions (Articles 23–27) have been identified via web search. The DLA Piper guide (updated January 2023) confirms the fundamental IP framework remains the Legal Regime for the Protection of Copyright and Related Rights (Lei n.º 15/14) and the Industrial Property Law. Presidential Decree No. 125/17 of June 12, 2017 concerns registration procedures for copyright, not exceptions and limitations. No TDM-specific exception has been enacted. The most permissive research-relevant exception remains Art. 25(1)(c), which permits reproduction in whole or in part by public libraries, non-commercial documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments, limited to the needs of their own activities, with full reproduction of a book excluded unless acquisition is impossible. This is an institutional exception (PURPLE). Uses: reproduction only. Works: all works except full books (unless unavailable). Users: institutions only. The user restriction is the most restrictive element, yielding PURPLE. No broader fair use, fair dealing, general research, or TDM exception exists in the law.

Exceptions considered

Art. 23(1)(a)-(b) and 23(2)0%Private Use

Reproduction of lawfully published work for exclusively private use; single copy of short excerpts by natural person for private non-profit use. Excludes integral reproduction of books, visual arts works, and digital databases.

Art. 240%Other

Reproduction of speeches, press reports, and fragments of works for information purposes in current events reporting.

Art. 25(1)(a)0%Quotation

Reproduction of quotations or summaries for purposes of criticism, discussion or teaching, to the extent justified by the objective.

Art. 25(1)(b)0%Educational

Inclusion of short pieces or fragments of others' works in one's own works intended for teaching.

Art. 25(1)(c)40%Library InstitutionalMost permissive

Reproduction in whole or in part by public libraries, non-commercial documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments, limited to needs of their own activities. Full reproduction of a book excluded unless acquisition is impossible.

Art. 260%Other

Reproduction or adaptation of computer programs by legitimate users for intended use and backup copies.

Art. 270%Other

Parodies and analogous compositions, provided they do not discredit the original work.

Law changes

Lei n.º 4/90, de 10 de Março — Lei dos Direitos de Autor

Baseline · Effective 1990-03-10

?

Dates: Effective 1990-03-10 · Enacted 1990-03-10

Why this score

The Lei n.º 4/90 de 10 de Março was the copyright law in force in Angola from 1990. Despite extensive web searches, the full statutory text of this law could not be located online — neither on WIPO Lex, the Angolan official gazette (Diário da República), nor on lex.ao or other legal databases. The law is referenced in the preamble of its successor (Lei n.º 15/14) as the law it revokes, confirming its existence and applicability from 1990. Without access to the actual text of the exceptions and limitations provisions, it is impossible to determine what research-related exceptions existed or to classify them. AMBIGUOUS is used because the statutory text itself could not be retrieved, making the scope of any exceptions genuinely indeterminate.

Lei n.º 15/14, de 31 de Julho — Lei dos Direitos de Autor e Conexos

Relevant update · Effective 2014-07-31

40%

Relevant section: Artigos 23, 24, 25, 26, 27

Dates: Effective 2014-07-31 · Enacted 2014-07-31

Why this score

The most permissive research-relevant exception is Art. 25(c), which permits reproduction in whole or in part of works previously made accessible to the public, by public libraries, non-commercial documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments, limited to the needs of their own activities. Full reproduction of a book is excluded unless acquisition is impossible. This permits full-work reproduction of non-book works (articles, musical scores, etc.) by qualifying institutions. Uses: reproduction only (no sharing/communication). Works: all works except full books (unless unavailable) — this is a partial work exclusion but full-work reproduction is available for at least some types. Users: restricted to institutions (public libraries, non-commercial documentation centres, scientific institutions, educational establishments). The most restrictive element is the user restriction (institutions only), which maps to PURPLE. Art. 23 (private use) is limited to short excerpts for the single-copy right and excludes integral reproduction of books, visual arts works, and digital databases. Art. 25(a) is limited to quotations and summaries. Neither of these is more permissive than Art. 25(c). Non-commercial restriction and copy-number limits are classification-neutral and were not factored into the color decision.

Exceptions considered

Art. 23(1)(a)-(b) and 23(2)0%Private Use

Reproduction of lawfully published work for exclusively private use; single copy of short excerpts by natural person for private non-profit use. Excludes integral reproduction of books, visual arts works, and digital databases.

Art. 240%Other

Reproduction of speeches, press reports, and fragments of works for information purposes in current events reporting.

Art. 25(1)(a)0%Quotation

Reproduction of quotations or summaries for purposes of criticism, discussion or teaching, to the extent justified by the objective.

Art. 25(1)(b)0%Educational

Inclusion of short pieces or fragments of others' works in one's own works intended for teaching.

Art. 25(1)(c)40%Library InstitutionalMost permissive

Reproduction in whole or in part by public libraries, non-commercial documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments, limited to needs of their own activities. Full reproduction of a book excluded unless acquisition is impossible.

Art. 260%Other

Reproduction or adaptation of computer programs by legitimate users for intended use and backup copies.

Art. 270%Other

Parodies and analogous compositions, provided they do not discredit the original work.

Original text

English rendering

Source links

Lei n.º 15/14, de 31 de Julho — Lei dos Direitos de Autor e Conexos

Current law confirmation · Effective 2014-07-31

40%

Relevant section: Artigos 23, 24, 25, 26, 27

Dates: Effective 2014-07-31 · Enacted 2014-07-31

Why this score

As of 2025, Lei n.º 15/14 remains the copyright law in force in Angola. No amendments to the exceptions and limitations provisions (Articles 23–27) have been identified via web search. The DLA Piper guide (updated January 2023) confirms the fundamental IP framework remains the Legal Regime for the Protection of Copyright and Related Rights (Lei n.º 15/14) and the Industrial Property Law. Presidential Decree No. 125/17 of June 12, 2017 concerns registration procedures for copyright, not exceptions and limitations. No TDM-specific exception has been enacted. The most permissive research-relevant exception remains Art. 25(1)(c), which permits reproduction in whole or in part by public libraries, non-commercial documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments, limited to the needs of their own activities, with full reproduction of a book excluded unless acquisition is impossible. This is an institutional exception (PURPLE). Uses: reproduction only. Works: all works except full books (unless unavailable). Users: institutions only. The user restriction is the most restrictive element, yielding PURPLE. No broader fair use, fair dealing, general research, or TDM exception exists in the law.

Exceptions considered

Art. 23(1)(a)-(b) and 23(2)0%Private Use

Reproduction of lawfully published work for exclusively private use; single copy of short excerpts by natural person for private non-profit use. Excludes integral reproduction of books, visual arts works, and digital databases.

Art. 240%Other

Reproduction of speeches, press reports, and fragments of works for information purposes in current events reporting.

Art. 25(1)(a)0%Quotation

Reproduction of quotations or summaries for purposes of criticism, discussion or teaching, to the extent justified by the objective.

Art. 25(1)(b)0%Educational

Inclusion of short pieces or fragments of others' works in one's own works intended for teaching.

Art. 25(1)(c)40%Library InstitutionalMost permissive

Reproduction in whole or in part by public libraries, non-commercial documentation centres, scientific institutions, or educational establishments, limited to needs of their own activities. Full reproduction of a book excluded unless acquisition is impossible.

Art. 260%Other

Reproduction or adaptation of computer programs by legitimate users for intended use and backup copies.

Art. 270%Other

Parodies and analogous compositions, provided they do not discredit the original work.

Original text

English rendering

Source links